Skip to content
Expresklik

The Venezuelan Crisis Could Now Define President Trump's Legacy - as well as America's Role in the World

Following launching a evening of shock and awe in Venezuela, Donald Trump now appears to be entering the nation-building business.

In a remarkable media briefing at his Mar-a-Lago resort on Saturday morning, the commander-in-chief announced that US forces had successfully seized Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife in an late-night operation in Caracas.

Trump then indicated that a group featuring Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth, working with Venezuelans, would be assuming control of the embattled nation.

"We are going to run the country until such time as we can do a safe, proper and careful transition," he said.

What precisely "running the country" entails is unclear, but the vow represents an abrupt change of course for the president, full of inconsistencies and formidable challenges.

A president who campaigned against "forever wars", who vehemently denounced past US attempts at regime change and who promised to implement an "America first" foreign policy is now betting his administration on successfully reconstructing a South American nation whose economy is in ruins and whose political stability has been eroded by years of authoritarian rule.

Yet, Trump was persistently upbeat.

He claimed his administration has a "perfect track record of winning" – and that this will be no different. He promised to recruit American oil firms to rebuild Venezuela's deteriorating production infrastructure, providing financing for the American reconstruction efforts and aiding the Venezuelan people.

He left open the possibility of sending American soldiers to Venezuela to further these efforts. "We're not afraid of boots on the ground…we had boots on the ground last night," he told reporters.

Trump, a vocal opponent of the US invasion of Iraq, will now have to heed the words of one of the American planners of the Iraq War, Secretary of State Colin Powell: "You break it, you bought it."

An Altered International Stance

The US has redefined Venezuela's destiny – for better or worse.

Trump took office nearly a year ago promising to be a peacemaker, but over the past year he has demonstrated that he is ready to use military force worldwide.

In the past week, he ordered airstrikes on Syria and Nigeria. In 2025, he targeted atomic sites in Iran, suspected drug-trafficking boats in the Caribbean, rebel forces in Yemen, militias in Somalia and Islamic militants in Iraq.

Unlike past actions, which have largely involved missiles and warplanes that minimize the exposure of American forces to harm, Trump's Venezuela strike – and his commitments to the future of that nation – are markedly distinct.

His objective, he said during his press conference, is to "make Venezuela great again."

Reactions from Allies and Critics

That variation of Trump's "Make America Great Again" – or Maga - mantra may be difficult for some of Trump's supporters to accept.

Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, a former Trump loyalist who split from the president after charging him of deserting his political base, was swift to criticize the president's actions on social media.

"Public outrage with our own government's never ending use of force and backing for overseas conflicts is understandable because we are forced to finance it," she stated. "This is what many in Maga thought they voted to end. Boy were we wrong."

Another notable Trump detractor, Republican Congressman Thomas Massie, contrasted the legal justification for Maduro's arrest – on weapons and drug trafficking charges – with Trump's explanation that the operation was to retake confiscated US oil and stop fentanyl production.

Most Republican lawmakers rallied behind the president, with House Speaker Mike Johnson describing the military action against a "illegitimate government" as "firm and justified".

Strategic Justifications and Global Implications

During his appearance, the president argued the Venezuelan operation furthered his "America First" priorities because it guaranteed US hemispheric security and provided a reliable source of oil.

He revived the Monroe Doctrine – an early 19th Century American diplomatic policy that declared the Western Hemisphere should be without influence by European powers – and renamed it the "Donroe Doctrine."

The move in Venezuela, Trump said, shows that "American dominance in the Western Hemisphere will not be challenged again."

The purpose of the new US national security strategy, he said, was to "protect trade, territory and assets that are core to our security interests." He labeled the Western Hemisphere as America's "home region."

Trump's decision to apprehend Maduro will provoke larger questions in international relations, however, and impact American ties with the world's other significant global powers.

The Chinese foreign ministry issued a statement voicing surprise and condemning what it said was a reckless assault on a sovereign nation.

During the Biden administration, the US offered comparable censures of Russia following its incursion of Ukraine. Now the Trump administration is trying to broker a ceasefire between those two nations – one that has frequently appeared to be more favourable to the Russian side.

Don Bacon, a centrist Republican congressman, expressed worry about the precedent Trump's actions might send.

"My main worry is now Russia will use this to excuse their unlawful and barbaric operations against Ukraine, or China to justify an attack of Taiwan."

Political Criticism and Constitutional Questions

Trump's Democratic critics were sharper.

"America should not be administering other countries for any reason," said a senator who serves on the Foreign Relations Committee. "We should have learned by now not to get entangled in perpetual conflicts and overthrow attempts that carry catastrophic consequences for Americans."

Another senior Democratic lawmaker said Maduro is a criminal and a dictator with a record of human rights abuses. But he condemned Trump's decision not to inform congressional leaders prior to launching the attack.

"The President has the legal duty to follow the law and uphold institutional norms in the United States," he said. "That is what placing America First requires."

Trump, in his remarks, explained that he chose not to inform Congress because he was worried they would "disclose" details of the operation before the attack.

A Path Forward Shrouded in Doubt

That military operation was a triumph – with zero American casualties and minimal harm to US assets. Trump, with his characteristic confidence, described the operation as a "spectacular assault" and "among the most stunning, successful and impressive displays of American military might and proficiency in US history."

Now he is gambling his legacy on that victory enduring, as the US claims it will take over running and rebuilding Venezuela - though what that actually means remains unknown. He and his administration must fortify a nation that has been in turmoil for years while calming a region that is sure to be cautious of what Trump's international strategy has planned for them.

Written by

Gary Mccarthy

An avid cyclist and e-bike enthusiast with over a decade of experience in sustainable transportation and gear reviews.

Expresklik

Type to search articles.